Posts by TaneMahuta

    Terra as long as there is an attack that is imminent or is launched a 'smokescreen' attack in advance of that will be allowed I am sure but what some have been doing and they have confessed to this on global chat is to having sent multiple 'pseudo missions' at Foxy over more than one day with no real attacks forthcoming and this is what the DEVS have found to be not 'fair'.


    As for your other point about the game needing more Oxygen or something well eventually any Customer will vote with their feet.


    This Board and also global chat needs a full time moderator who is able to deal with things promptly not every 48 hours or so.

    I am not sure what post you are reading Foxy but this is my FIRST post and it does NOT mention anything about punishments


    On global chat on the Chichen Itza server one player is telling others that sending multiple spying missions or multiple single warrior attacks to another player is against the rules.


    Is this so? If so the RULES should be updated as there is nothing in the rules to say this is thecase.


    The following was my next post


    Quote

    GRIMM I doubt if the DEVS will discuss why a player was banned on the forum. IF a player in your Tribe was banned then it is best to discuss this in private with the DEVS. It could well be that the player was banned for another reason than seding multiple spy missions at another player. IF a player was banned for ONLY sending multiple spy missions at another player then given it is not stated that this is against the RULES it is not correct.


    Hopefully the DEVS will address my original question and that will clarify this issue.


    and it is addressed to GRIMM and again I make it clear that I don't expect the DEVS to discuss punishments in public.


    If you are going to keep feeling the need to reply to every thread I post in could you at least get your facts right.


    It is so so so tiresome.

    I never said punishments should be discussed in public.
    The point I was making ws to GRIMM and it was exactly along the lines that there might have been more to the ban than the players in his tribe who got warned or banned told him.


    In some ways it would be nice for a Tribe Leader to be told by DEVS why a player was banned so that they can then decide what to do with that player themselves - as in kick them from the Tribe warn them etc.

    Actually Terra hopefully one will be able to use the TAMBO or a similar construct for attacking purposes.


    In similar games I have played what happens is that in a group attack situation one player starts the attack and invites others to join that attack. Of course previous to the attack each attacker would have to agree on what troops each player is sending and then the attack is simmed to make sure that it will be a success. Also each player will have to make sure they have adequate resources for the troops they are contributing. Then the attack commences and during the attack the players would spy on the player being attacked to make sure that that player has not managed to increase his/her defensive capabilities by setting up a group defend to ward off the attack. If so the players all call off the attack. If for some reason one of the attckers does NOT call off their attack then they lose their own troops.


    I am not sure if the DEVS have group attacks in mind when developing the TAMBO or if it will only be there for group defends.

    in ALL games similar to this I have played if one is attacking another player then one should be allowed to send as many spy missions as they like.
    The reason is this.
    A player under attack can get his/her friends to group defend them (in this game they have to donate the troops to that player) during an attack. So the attacker needs to be able to see till the very last minute if the other player has managed to get extra troops from others or another of his/her Cities to help against the attack.
    The attacker should also be able to slow down the spy that he/she should send seconds before their attack lands so if the defender has times it to the last second to have troops at his/her City they can see that and can abort the attack.


    I don't think sending hundreds of spying missions at a given player to annoy a player is in the spirit of the game but as I said since it has not been forbidden in the rules to ban players for doing so before the rules have been updated might also be unfair. BUT if they had been warned and chose not to heed the warning then the ban is fair.

    I think it would be good to quantify this.
    That is to say how many dummy attacks one is allowed to do against another player.
    If you are going to deal with this on a cse by case basis then some player might get upset.


    Personally I don't think that it is necessarily in the 'spirit' of the game for players to 'gang up' and send spies at another player just to fill up their 'in-box'.


    That said since this has not been stated in the rules to ban a player for it might not be fair unless they were warned and chose to keep doing it.

    GRIMM I doubt if the DEVS will discuss why a player was banned on the forum. IF a player in your Tribe was banned then it is best to discuss this in private with the DEVS. It could well be that the player was banned for another reason than seding multiple spy missions at another player. IF a player was banned for ONLY sending multiple spy missions at another player then given it is not stated that this is against the RULES it is not correct.


    Hopefully the DEVS will address my original question and that will clarify this issue.

    I am not saying I agree with players bombarding another player with spies but it is NOT against the RULES as they are currently stated.


    Having played other very similar games I foreshadowed this and another attack feature called 'slow attacks' on a much older thread and M0H0 said it was not against the RULES.


    So I think unless the RULES have changed it is not right for players to claim that sending multiple spying missions to ONE player is against the RULES.

    On global chat on the Chichen Itza server one player is telling others that sending multiple spying missions or multiple single warrior attacks to another player is against the rules.


    Is this so? If so the RULES should be updated as there is nothing in the rules to say this is the case.

    I am NOT sure if this is because English is NOT the first language of the DEVS or NOT but in my opinion the DEVS - Gaviotta and M0H0 are missing the point.


    At NO time did I EVER butt into someone else's post and cause trouble.


    There was ABSOLUTELY NO REASON - I REPEAT - NO REASON for Foxy to post in my thread.
    She is the ONE who inflamed the situation.


    Why you cannot see that is simply beyond me.


    It IS SIMPLY BEYOND me.


    She has an issue from MAYAPAN days against me and she wont tell me what it IS.
    Just so other players know she was in effect 2-I-C of the CHI Tribe on the MAYAPAN Server.
    I was not in the Leadership group at all but at the time Bud (Leader of CHI on the MAYPAN Server) was going on holiday I was made an ADMIN of the Tribe and then added to the Facebok HIGH COUNCIL group that had been created for TENOC and CHI to devise a strategy to deal with the RR Tribe. There was something said by either Zexas (aka Foxy) and Bex on that page that led to a disagreement between Hoggel (Leader of TENOC on MAYAPAN) and the CHI Tribe. Then somewhere along the line Zexa decided to attack the RR Tribe on her own and lost her troops and then left the Tribe and eventually formed her own Tribe on MAYAPAN. These ARE facts and verifiable by Hoggel if he is still around.


    She is the ONE who then created a tribe XINXEL on UXMAL then ruined it for her fellow Tribe members and then without so much as a by your leave disbanded the Tribe and then attacked her fellow Tribe members.


    She is the one who by all accounts - as described to me by those in her Xinxel Tribe on UXMAL that joined CHI in the end - got her players all fighting on their Facebook Forum page. By the way I insisted that any XINXEL player who joined CHI on UXMAL was NOT to discuss the goings on in that Tribe on the CHI Tribe Wall. I gave her the benefit of the doubt.


    She then starts Foxes on Chichen Itza and what happens? The Tribe disintegrates.


    She pretends in a private message to me that English is NOT her first language purposely mis-spelling words and then pretends to others she is a MALE.


    So what does that say about her???


    She is trying to get under my skin and she is walking a tightrope and trying to get me upset.


    I am amazed you as DEVS do NOT see this and don't do something about it.


    I don't expect a public warning but something needs to be done in private.


    Also you two are hardly about on global chat and she has been saying stuff that again walks a tightrope trying to rile me up.


    The above is how pathetic Foxy/ Xinx/Zexa has been.

    Hi Gaviotta


    I see you locked that thread.


    May I point out that Foxy felt the need to reply to my thread and she is trying to get under my skin.


    I did NO wrong.


    IF anyone needs to be talked to it is her not me.


    Also unlike myself she is choosing to register on this Forum under another name when many of us know she is Zexa / Zinx.


    She has now just about confirmed it.

    Good to see that your problem has been rectified Tanemahuta :)


    You are correct that I am not a dev, TaneMahuta. However, I am an active player who is entitled as any other player to post on this forum within the rules and guidelines. Of course you can email the devs/admin privately if you prefer that other players cannot see your complaints and thus have no opportunity to comment upon them :)


    I did NOT complain. It was a question addressed to the DEVS.


    You obviously feel a need to piost in any thread I post in.


    I think you have a PROBLEM.


    It is also interesting that you say you ae an active player and have played on all three servers (refer your post in the other thread by Bud) but funnily you ONLY registered on this forum recently so you seem to feel the need to hide your true identity.


    I wonder why.


    I wonder if it is beacuse you could not lead any TRIBE of any size with any ability of a good Leader.

    I am NOT interested in your opinion.


    There was no need for you to butt in on my thread.


    Obviously somethng is irritating you so I suggest gosomewhere and scratch your irritation.


    You have a very HIGH opinion of yourself.


    The day you are able to bring anything of value to the forum then people might actually care.


    It is sad that the likes of FURRY are not on the forum to express their views and their helpful hints to players.

    It is a bit rich of you to talk about protection Foxy.
    You are using Danqui's account which is almost all the time in P mode to protect your troops.


    I am TOTALLY opposed to sharing troops.
    It is fraught with danger.
    As I have said again and again and AGAIN there is NOTHING to stop a player 'stealing' the troops donated to him/her.


    It is frankly a STUPID idea.


    From the DAY we started on MAYAPAN the TAMBO had this as its feature "Coming soon in Tentlan: attacks with allies. This building will be available in a coming-up update, stay tuned!"


    Well we have waited and waited with open ears and now some have tuned OUT 2 servers later.


    Some of us believe that the DEVS are having issues getting the TAMBO to work. if so they owe it to us to tell us so.


    Attacking is part of the game but when we started in MAYAPAN the good players who were mostly in TENOC at the time decided that they would NOT attack others until the game was more developed.


    Then RR and El Draque came on the scene and some players riled them by accused them without proof of cheating etc and that got them attacking all and sundry. it is worth noting that they knew more about the game than we did on MAYAPAN due to their experience on the Russsian Server.


    It is very easy to take the high ground in this game but it has a long way to go before it is more playable and more Tribe friendly.


    How each player chooses to play the game is upto them.


    If some believe they are the best so be it but just look at the rankings! Thsoe at the top are the Top players. How they got their is their business really. if they bought their way there so be it. I would not criticise them as in effect they are keeping the game going.


    On MAYAPAN there is no more targets left to achieve for some of us bar attack a barb lvl 7 and that requires 100 Ek Chuah at least to beat a barb lvl 7

    The font issues are only on the Chichen Itza server.
    It hs nothing to do with my not liking change or anything like that the changes mean that the numbers run into one another.


    I wish people who were NOT DEVS stopped butting into something gthey have no idea about.


    Or are you a DEV now Foxy.

    A very good question Bud!
    I just checked and there are 330 members on MAYAPAN and at most 240 are playing if that.
    It would be good to get some feedback from the DEVS but their response times have not been great.


    MAYAPAN and UXMAL need some new funcationality for sure else they are both dead. The CHICHEN ITZA Server is only active due to one player being attacking